Acute exacerbation of idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome following asymptomatic coronavirus disease 2019: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has suggested that some autoimmune diseases develop after the occurrence of coronavirus disease 2019. Hypereosinophilic syndrome is a rare disease presenting with idiopathic eosinophilia and multiple organ involvement, including the skin, lungs, gastrointestinal tract, heart, and nervous system. The diagnosis of idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome poses a dilemma because clinical manifestation and serum biomarkers are similar to those of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Only a few cases have been reported where coronavirus disease 2019 may have caused the new onset or exacerbation of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis or idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 48-year-old Japanese woman with history of asthma who developed deteriorating symptoms of insidiously developed idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome following asymptomatic coronavirus disease 2019. She developed acute-onset back pain, tachycardia, abdominal discomfort, loss of appetite, weight loss, skin rash on the back, and numbness of the extremities 3 days after the quarantine period. Extreme hypereosinophilia with multiple abnormal findings including pulmonary ground-glass opacity lesions and mononeuritis multiplex was consistent with hypereosinophilic syndrome. Normal cellularity with eosinophilic proliferation in the bone marrow and negative FIP1L1-PDGFRA raised the diagnosis of idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome. Although the patient tested negative for anti-neutrophilic cytoplasmic antibodies and skin biopsy was negative for vasculitis, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis could not be excluded. Since glucocorticoids are a standard therapy for both idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, we initiated glucocorticoids following a multidisciplinary discussion. CONCLUSION: Although the relationship between asymptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 and acute idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome exacerbation was uncertain, the chronological order of the symptomatic development suggested a possible link. More clinical cases and population-based studies are needed to determine the potential effect of coronavirus disease 2019 on autoimmune diseases.

Clinical characteristics of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 omicron variant compared with the delta variant: a retrospective case-control study of 318 outpatients from a single sight institute in Japan.

Background: Clinical characteristics, including laboratory parameters, of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant have been limited. Methods: This retrospective case-control study was conducted in a single hospital. Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who visited the Asahikawa City Hospital outpatient department as new patients and underwent blood tests were included in this study. We analyzed the data from January 2022 to April 2022 during the Omicron phase and from April 2021 to October 2021 during the Delta phase. Patients who were treated at other hospitals after visiting our hospital were excluded. All blood tests were performed before treatment for COVID-19 was initiated. Demographic information, laboratory data, and clinical courses were extracted from electronic medical records. We matched the two groups by age and comorbidities and compared their characteristics. We also analyzed factors associated with pneumonia in the Omicron phase. Results: A total of 151 Omicron patients and 167 delta patients were analyzed in this study. The mean age, rate of comorbidities, and vaccination were significantly higher in the Omicron group. The number of patients with pneumonia or those requiring oxygen, admissions, or both was significantly lower in the Omicron group. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) levels were significantly lower in the Omicron group. Compared with the mild symptom and pneumonia groups in the Omicron group, older age, higher body mass index (BMI), higher non-vaccination, higher LDH, and higher CRP levels were associated with the pneumonia group. Conclusion: The Omicron variant is associated with a reduction in hospitalization and the risk of pneumonia compared to the delta variant in a real-life clinical setting. In the Omicron variant, the risk of pneumonia is related to high-risk factors, laboratory data such as LDH and CRP levels, and no vaccination.

Mutations in the nonstructural proteins of SARS-CoV-2 may contribute to adverse clinical outcome in patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: From late March through April 2021, we experienced a cluster of patients with COVID-19, named "Cluster K", with rapid severe illness compared with those who were infected before. METHODS: Patients with COVID-19 who were enrolled in this study were divided into two groups: 66 patients from November 2020 to March 2021 (group A) and 37 patients whose infection links were traced from Cluster K (group B). The primary outcome was mortality rate, and the secondary outcome was maximal oxygen flow rate as the severity of the disease. Viral genome sequences were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Mortality rates were 6.1% in group A and 16.2% in group B (odds ratio: 2.97, 95% confidence interval: 0.65-15.38). The patients in group B required high oxygen flow rate (O2 ≥10 l/min) in the earlier clinical course (P = 0.029). Viral genome sequences revealed five amino acid mutations; of these, four were found on three nonstructural proteins (NSPs): one in nsp3 and nsp15, two in nsp6 (one of them is near the potential sites under positive selective pressure). Another one was on the S protein. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that mutations in NSPs, especially nsp6, are associated with adverse clinical outcome in patients with COVID-19.

Mutations in the non-structural proteins of SARS-CoV-2 may contribute to adverse clinical outcome in COVID-19 patients

Background . From late March through April 2021, we experienced a cluster of COVID-19 patients, named “Cluster K”, with rapid severe illness compared to those who were infected before. Method . COVID-19 patients enrolled in this study were divided into two groups: 66 patients from November 2020 to March 2021(group A), 37 patients whose infection links were traced from Cluster K (group B). The primary outcome was mortality rate, and the secondary outcome was maximal oxygen flow rate as severity of the disease. Viral genome sequences were compared between two groups. Results . Mortality rates were 6.1% in group A and 16.2% in group B (OR: 2.97, 95%CI: 0.65-15.38). The patients in group B required high oxygen flow rate (O2 ≥10 L/min) in earlier clinical course (p=0.029). Viral genome sequences revealed five amino acid mutations. Of these, four were found on three non-structural proteins (NSPs): one in nsp3 and 15, two in nsp6 (one of them is near the potential sites under positive selective pressure). Other one was on S protein. Conclusion . This study suggests that mutations in NSPs, especially nsp6, are associated with adverse clinical outcome in COVID-19 patients.

Impact of Antibody Cocktail Therapy Combined with Casirivimab and Imdevimab on Clinical Outcome for patients with COVID-19 in A Real-Life Setting: A Single Institute Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recent data from clinical trials suggest that antibody cocktail therapy, which combined casirivimab and imdevimab, is linked to the reduction of the risk of hospitalization or death among high-risk patients with COVID-19. However, it remains unclear how effective the therapy is in a real-life clinical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with COVID-19 with high-risk factors who underwent the antibody cocktail therapy, compared with those who were not given the cocktail therapy while being isolated in nonmedical facilities during the same period. RESULTS: Data from 55 patients who received the antibody cocktail therapy and 53 patients with initial isolation in nonmedical facilities were analyzed. A total of 22 (41.5 %) of 53 patients staying in isolation facilities were eventually hospitalized and received medical interventions. By contrast, 13 (23.6 %) of 55 patients who received the antibody cocktail therapy subsequently underwent further medical interventions. In multivariate analysis, the antibody cocktail therapy significantly reduced the need for further medical interventions by 70 % compared with isolation (odds ratio=0.30, 95%CI [0.10-0.87], p=0.027). Patients with percutaneous oxygen saturation 96% or higher were significantly favoured for the therapy and had an advantage. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that the antibody cocktail therapy is associated with reducing burden on hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic.